This is not to say that the literary and socio-critical reflections of Will Self are not as valid as the more optimistic speculations that I favour, and his essay amusingly focuses on the typical British unease with building tall and modernism in general. Apologies to Bruce Sterling and Will Self, by the way. When I do so, predictably, some of the more outlandish, dystopian and entertaining essays fall by the way side. ![]() The yardstick by which I propose to measure the relative success of the essays in this book is whether they offer the most plausible and comprehensive vision on the future of the skyscraper within a larger sustainable urban context. However, if their explosive, and largely unregulated, growth is left unchecked, they will continue to be used to reinforce inequality and class divisions by creating privatised, heavily secured havens for the few, will continue to deplete resources, will create micro climates and heat islands, and last, but not the least, will remain a massive contributor to CO2 emissions and thus speed up the process of climate change. In the most positive scenario this building type can help to solve problems of an increasingly urbanised and overcrowded planet: they can make cities denser, function as carbon sinks, generate energy and be used for rainwater retention and urban agriculture. The angle for this little publication was to invite people outside or obliquely related to the profession of architecture to think and reflect.This approach is, it has to be said, appealing, not in the least since the consequences of building skyscrapers with respect to their ecological, material and energy footprints are so large that the decision of their construction ought to be a larger societal question and a shared, public responsibility. Sensing that the development of skyscrapers is entering a new phase in its existence, and inspired by the desire to let skyscrapers be more than just the expression of engineering prowess and the symbols of national pride of emerging economies, the practice Skidmore Owings & Merrill, possibly the foremost innovator of the skyscraper, invited nine writers, critics, futurists and journalists to ponder the future of the skyscraper. And yet, little more than a decade later, with the building of Taipei 101, One World Trade Center, Makkah Royal Clock Tower, the Burj Khalifa, and with many other talls and supertalls on site or in the pipeline, evidence suggests otherwise. At the time, with the 24-hour news cycle operating in overdrive, pundits and experts predicted that this, finally, would sound the death knell for building tall. The ultimate consequence of these negative symbolic and political connotations played itself out with the terrorist attacks on the towers of the World Trade Center in 2001. In the Fifties and Sixties skyscrapers further spread across city centres in the USA and the world, and while the designs became increasingly derivative and interchangeable, the symbolism changed to become analogous with overdevelopment and American cultural, political and economic dominance. ![]() Stylistically they moved from the historicising, 'European' style blocks and towers of the 1860s to the late 1910s, to the ziggurat step-backs of the Twenties and Thirties to become, after the war, the international style, glass-clad symbols of the power and modernity of corporate America.Īrtists, photographers and writers - for better and worse - perceived the skyscraper as the archetypal image of the new, of progress, and as a unique symbol of American energy and optimism. Its emergence was made possible by rapid industrial progress and advances in building technology (most notably the invention of the elevator, steel-frame construction and plateglass manufacture), and it was forced upwards by speculation and the space limitations of the street grid. In cities such as Chicago and New York the type developed between 18 in the maelstrom of laissez-faire economic development and explosive population growth. The central icon of the American city in the 20th century is, without doubt, the skyscraper. Architecture practice Skidmore Owings & Merrill invited nine writers and journalists to ponder the future of tall buildings.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |